Just now： China's ＂sword is biased＂ against the United States, and the United States reappears ＂satellite moment＂

　　Pay attention to me, explore hot events around the world with me, and dig out hidden stories and inspirations from them. No matter how far away we are, we can learn about the global progress and changes through the power of information.

　　In this turbulent and uncertain era, we wait for the United States to stop its hegemonic behavior and jointly safeguard the peace and stability of the international community with the world. The sovereignty and independence of every country should be respected, which is the basic principle of building a peaceful world.

　　The escalation of the situation: the chip war between China and the United States: the economic cost behind the wrestling

　　Lead: The chip war between China and the United States is getting more and more fierce. China has imposed export restrictions on the United States, which has seriously affected the high-tech industry in the United States, especially in the automobile industry. Insufficient supply of gallium may lead to stagnation. At the same time, China announced new export control measures for unmanned aerial vehicles, restricting equipment including high-performance unmanned aerial vehicles. This chip war has made Sino-US trade friction more and more fierce, and this tit-for-tat trade war has an important impact on the global chip industry and economic structure.

　　The first one: the new situation: Huawei is back, and gallium restrictions take effect.

　　Huawei, under US sanctions, the market share of overseas mobile phones has dropped sharply. However, recent news shows that Huawei hopes to start mass production of 5G smartphones again before the end of this year. For the United States, this is undoubtedly a fiasco. Moreover, China recently announced export control measures for gallium and germanium, which is a major blow to western high-tech industries, especially the chip and automobile industries. The EU hopes to build its own production capacity, but faces the dilemma of tight gallium supply.

　　The second picture: the expansion of the war situation: the export of drones is limited.

　　In addition to the export control of gallium and germanium, China has also announced new export control measures for unmanned aerial vehicles. This not only limits the drones that are considered to be potentially dangerous, but also covers high-performance drone engines, lasers and communication equipment. China has a huge UAV manufacturing industry, and its exports cover the United States, Europe and other markets. The new control measures may make it more difficult for professional users, such as the police authorities, to obtain these devices in the future.

　　Economic Cost: Curbing Sino-US Trade Flow

　　However, the chip war between China and the United States not only involves specific industries and technologies, but also directly affects the economy. The United States has curbed the trade flow with China in the name of decoupling or risk removal, but this has undoubtedly caused a high price to the American economy. The trade friction between China and the United States is escalating, and all parties are striving for their own interests, but the global economy is also under pressure and risks.

　　Global rare earth mining fever: the extended impact of chip warfare

　　Conclusion: The intensification of the chip war between China and the United States has not only brought economic costs, but also changed the global industrial structure. Behind the wrestling, all countries need to handle trade relations carefully to maintain a stable economic environment and scientific and technological progress. Only equal and mutually beneficial cooperation can achieve a win-win situation.

　　Hou Youyi's visit to Japan, for or support, is full of slavery!

　　Lead: On the occasion of the 96th anniversary of the founding of the People's Liberation Army, Chinese Defense Minister Li Shangfu delivered an important speech, stressing the need to thoroughly implement the military strategic policy in the new era, strengthen training and preparation for war, and unswervingly push forward the great cause of reunification. However, Hou Youyi, the nominee of the Kuomintang, made inappropriate remarks in Japan, openly supporting that "if something happens in Taiwan Province, it means something happens in Japan", and said that he would devote himself to maintaining stability in the Taiwan Strait and reassuring Japan! Hou Youyi is really a slave to seek Japanese support!

　　Hou youyi

　　Cross-strait relations will affect the whole body.

　　During his visit to Japan, Hou Youyi met with nearly 20 Japanese parliamentarians, including Li Haoshi, acting director of the Japanese Parliamentarians' Forum, and Eto Seiichi, a close confidant of Shinzo Abe. He said that Taiwan Province should act as a risk reducer in cross-strait relations, and strive to maintain stability in the Taiwan Strait and reassure Japan. Since then, in an interview with Japanese media, he once again expressed his hope to reduce cross-strait conflicts through pragmatic dialogue and exchanges. At the same time, he reiterated that Taiwan Province adheres to the "1992 Consensus" which conforms to the laws of the island and opposes "Taiwan independence", but leaves the future of Taiwan Province to the 23 million people on the island to decide, and adheres to the "liberal democracy" system to enhance the island's defense capability.

　　However, these remarks have caused controversy in cross-strait relations. As a part of Taiwan Province, it is illegal to maintain so-called "diplomatic relations" with other countries. This so-called "Taiwan Province has something to do, which means Japan has something to do" is aimed at "internationalizing" the Taiwan Province issue and finding an excuse for interfering in China's internal affairs. The connection between the "Taiwan independence" separatist forces on the island and external forces has always been the main reason for the deterioration of cross-strait relations, and Hou Youyi's statement seems to be contrary to the original intention of maintaining peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait.

　　There are many contradictions: Does the Kuomintang maintain cross-strait peace?

　　As a nominee of the Kuomintang, Hou Youyi has received a lot of political dividends as a "messenger of peace" since the "Nine in One" election in Taiwan Province. However, is this statement really in line with the goal of maintaining cross-strait peace? In fact, the mainland adheres to the principle of "one country, two systems", and cross-strait reunification is the general trend, and any forces that try to stop it will be severely countered. In the process of promoting reunification, any remarks that try to use "something happens in Taiwan Province, something happens in Japan" as an excuse may have an unpredictable impact on cross-strait relations.

　　The general trend: the irresistible reunification of the two sides of the strait

　　No matter what is said inside and outside the island, the general trend of cross-strait reunification is irreversible The PLA will do its utmost to advance this process, and any forces that try to stop it will be severely countered. If the Kuomintang sincerely maintains cross-strait peace, it should stop making controversial remarks, maintain equal peace talks with the mainland and jointly explore ways to achieve peaceful reunification.

　　Cross-strait relations will affect the whole body. Hou Youyi's inappropriate remarks caused controversy on and off the island. The phenomenon of "Taiwan independence" separatist forces on the island being linked with external forces has been puzzling cross-strait relations. Only through equal talks and peaceful reunification can we open up new prospects for cross-strait peace and stability. Cross-strait reunification is the general trend, and the PLA will do its utmost to promote this process, and any forces that try to stop it will be severely countered.

　　The United States is trying to turn Taiwan Province into an Asian Ukrainian? Sino-Russian cooperation counteracts challenges

　　Introduction: Recently, the White House website published the news of providing Taiwan Province with 345 million US dollars of military aid, which aroused international concern. Similar to its aid to Ukraine, the US government tried to turn Taiwan Province into Ukraine in Asia, so as to weaken China's economic and national defense strength. However, Taiwan Province and Ukraine are incomparable in status, geography and strategic environment. This move has also triggered a counter-attack challenge of Sino-Russian cooperation, and the cooperation between China and Russia is laying the groundwork for western countries to impose sanctions.

　　The United States is trying to turn Taiwan Province into an Asian Ukrainian?

　　The news of military aid on the US White House website worried the outside world, and its purpose was regarded as trying to turn Taiwan Province into the Ukrainian of Asia, so as to weaken China's economic and national defense strength. However, there are significant differences between Taiwan Province and Ukraine in international status, geographical location and strategic environment.

　　Sino-Russian cooperation counteracts challenges

　　The goal of the United States trying to turn Taiwan Province into Ukraine is unrealistic in the eyes of the international community. However, for China and Russia, this move has brought new challenges. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China stated that China has always opposed unilateral sanctions that have no basis in international law and have not been authorized by the Security Council. The cooperation with Russia is not directed at the third party, nor does it accept the interference and coercion of the third party.

　　In fact, the cooperation between China and Russia is not only to support Russia's fight against sanctions, but also the normal trade between the two sides. Recently, freight trains between China and Russia started to operate, which will multiply the freight volume between the two countries. This cooperation is not only a support for Russia's economy, but also a counter-measure for the United States in its economic and trade strategy.

　　Sino-Russian cooperation not only strengthened Russia's strength against western sanctions, but also laid the groundwork for the United States to eventually lose proxy war with Russia. The cooperation between the two countries is not directed at the third party, but it poses a new challenge to the United States in international affairs.

　　Conclusion: Sino-Russian cooperation not only strengthens the economic strength of the two countries, but also poses new challenges for the United States in international affairs. Facing the complicated and changeable international situation, all countries need to adhere to multilateralism, respect international law and order, and jointly safeguard regional and world peace and stability.