Accept two completely opposite concepts and know when to choose one of them.

　　Language is very limited, and many things can't be fully expressed in language. In addition, all discourses are contextualized, without which no viewpoint can be established independently.

　　For example, a person should take the world as his own responsibility, worry about the endless distance and countless people every day, and care about the crying in the distance; Or the endless distance and countless people have nothing to do with me. I care more about my crying than the crying in the distance.

　　There is nothing wrong with the above two views. How to choose depends on your physical and mental state. When you are in good physical and mental state and feel very powerful, you can of course choose the former, but if you feel that your life is a mess, you must of course take care of yourself first.

　　For another example, whether everyone should be responsible for their emotions or blame others for their emotions, that is, we commonly call it carrying our own pot or throwing it to others, depending on whether you are strong inside.

　　When your heart is in a strong state, of course, you can bravely take responsibility for all your emotions, but when your heart is not so strong, of course, you can blame the problem on another person. This is also a survival strategy.

　　Strong people help themselves, and great people help others. Of course, powerful people will be vulnerable, and great people will have selfish thoughts. There is no forever strong, and there is no forever great man.

　　Allow yourself not to be strong at any time, and accept that you are still far from greatness most of the time; Accept yourself as an ordinary person and allow yourself to throw the pot occasionally. Sometimes enterprising, sometimes depressed; Sometimes awake, sometimes confused, maybe it is the normal state of life.

　　Perhaps the so-called wisdom is to accept two sets of completely opposite ideas and know which one to choose under what circumstances.

　　For example, whether you choose whether your parents are traveling far away or where your heart is and where your home is depends on whether you want to travel far away, whether you can travel far away, or even whether you are traveling far away.

　　Originally, today I wanted to write that "I am angry" and "You make me angry" are two completely different world views. Whether you are responsible for your emotions or throw the emotional pot to others depends on your hard work.

　　But I'm keeping these two options open now. When my heart has spare capacity, I am angry, and I am responsible for my emotions; When I was exhausted, you made me very angry. I threw you the emotional pot.

　　The ancients were very wise. They would say that every man is responsible for the rise and fall of the world, and at the same time, they would add that the meat eaters who rise and fall of the country seek it. What happens is closely related to what we should undertake.

　　The ancients will say that all the virtues's filial piety is the first, regardless of his heart; The ancients will also say that all evils are the first, regardless of the heart. It really needs to be analyzed in detail to see whether a person is talking about heart or doing.

　　The ancients will also say that if you are rich, you will help the world, and if you are poor, you will be immune to it. Whether you want to help the world, or whether you want to be immune to it depends on your physical and mental state, your resource reserve and your energy accumulation. There is nothing wrong with it, and it is all good.

　　Love yourself well, or devote yourself selflessly to mankind; Is it a pot, or a pot; Depends on your mental state.

　　In fact, to love yourself is to love mankind, because you are also a member of mankind; Perhaps there is no selfless dedication, because behind selfless dedication, it does not rule out some unspeakable personal needs.