Online celebrity posed and was arrested by a stranger for accompanying wine, and online celebrity's little group was scolded miserably： it was too suffocating.
Unexpectedly, the video of "Eating with girlfriends and being asked by strange men to accompany wine" that caused heated discussion was actually a well-planned pose. What is even more unexpected is that online celebrity, who has only 4 million fans, will make online celebrity, who has 10 million fans, become a clown and stand on the cusp of public opinion.
Not long ago, a woman, online celebrity, posted a video on a short video platform, "I was asked by a strange man to accompany me to dinner with my best friend" and boarded a hot search. The people who eat melons are also very angry about the experience of the women in the video and condemn the men who flirt.
The public opinion caused by the incident was too large. According to the accident location provided in the video, the local police intervened in the investigation, but the truth was surprising.
Who would have thought that this infuriating wine-accompanying incident was actually staged by online celebrity. According to online celebrity, a 24-year-old woman, she conspired with others to shoot this so-called "being asked by a strange man to accompany her" video in a restaurant according to the script, hoping to use this as a topic to bring traffic to her account.
Earlier, someone questioned that her story was a script. She questioned the placement of the camera. As a result, she was attacked by this online celebrity and led many netizens to attack the netizen who made the comment.
In the details disclosed by the police, in addition to her own account, the police also disclosed the video surveillance in the private room at that time. After the filming was completed, these people also got together to discuss. In the face of evidence, the woman online celebrity and her team of four "happily" took administrative detention, and her account was cancelled by the platform.
But did it really end like this? Are those melon-eaters who voiced their support for the so-called wine-accompanying incident and supported the woman online celebrity deceived in vain?
Naturally, they found a new outlet, that is, a small group of tens of millions of online celebrity. Some netizens pointed out that she commented "It's suffocating" under the video of online celebrity when the matter was not yet definite.
Very simple four words, it can be seen that it should be the sympathy of the same woman, and she did not explore the truth of this matter. But as a big online celebrity with millions of fans, the impact of her comments is quite explosive.
Just after things reversed, a small group in online celebrity naturally became the object of all people's spit. Some netizens bluntly said that Xiao Tuantuan, as a public figure, should not comment at will without knowing the truth. Even those four words are easy to cause controversy. Some people even ridiculed Xiao Tuantuan as a "messenger of justice" and a "suffocating sister".
Faced with such a situation, the operation team of the small group did not choose to respond, but began to delete comments, but it was a pity to no avail. Some fans stood up and voiced for a small group, saying that she was also a victim. She didn't know, and she was cheated.
It's just such an excuse, netizens don't buy it, and they bluntly don't know the truth and spread rumors. If they don't know it, they will be fine. As a public figure, you have to speak out when you don't understand the situation, and you should pay attention to your influence. After all, it is a big online celebrity with millions of fans, and this influence can be seen.
Just because of this comment, a small group in online celebrity directly lost 20,000 fans, and many netizens demanded an apology in the comment area.
Over the years, similar things have happened a lot. Small compositions and videos broke the news, and various reversals have never been broken. From the incident of Xiao Huijun to the slander of the cake shop owner that happened not long ago, many people have understood that if there is no official notification on the Internet, you should not stand in line and speak out at random.
Indeed, not everyone has the ability to distinguish right from wrong, nor is everyone indifferent to a public figure with millions of fans and online celebrity's speech. As a ten million-level online celebrity, its influence is there. Any sentence may make her become the guide of cyber violence if she is not careful. Once things are reversed, it's not as simple as hitting the face.
So far, a small group in online celebrity has not made any response to this matter, perhaps discussing with the team how to conduct public relations.
It's just that under her personal account, the content of the message is all about the discussion of this matter, which makes it difficult for her to stay out of it.
"Innocent if you don't know" is no longer applicable to the present era, and public figures should be more cautious in their words and deeds.
Declaration: All article resources on this website, unless otherwise specified or labeled, are collected from online resources. If the content on this website infringes on the legitimate rights and interests of the original author, you can contact this website to delete it.
